<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>California Cannabis &#187; USA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://californiacannabis.net/tag/usa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://californiacannabis.net</link>
	<description>Medical Marijuana News for Patients, in accordance with California State Law Proposition 215 (HS 11362.5)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 07:31:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>2008: The Year In Review &#8211; NORML&#8217;s Top 10 Events That Shaped Marijuana Policy</title>
		<link>http://californiacannabis.net/2009/01/2008-the-year-in-review-normls-top-10-events-that-shaped-marijuana-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://californiacannabis.net/2009/01/2008-the-year-in-review-normls-top-10-events-that-shaped-marijuana-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cali Cannabis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Calfornia Medical Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Cannabis Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California NORML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decriminalization of Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Policy Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Cannabis Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballot measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana law reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical pot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NORML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staphyloccus aureus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://californiacannabis.net/?p=259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">NORML&#8217;s Top Ten Events That Shaped Marijuana Policy in 2008 </p>
<p> #1 Landslide At The Ballot Box: Election Day Voters Reject Bush War Doctrine </p>
<p>Millions of Americans nationwide voted on Election Day for marijuana law reform, approving nine out of ten ballot measures to liberalize penalties on cannabis use and possession. In Massachusetts, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #008000;"><strong>NORML&#8217;s Top Ten Events That Shaped Marijuana Policy in 2008 </strong></span></p>
<p><strong> #1 Landslide At The Ballot Box: Election Day Voters Reject Bush War Doctrine </strong></p>
<p>Millions of Americans nationwide voted on Election Day for marijuana law reform, approving nine out of ten ballot measures to liberalize penalties on cannabis use and possession. In Massachusetts, where 65 percent of voters decided to reduce marijuana possession penalties to a $100 fine, and Michigan, where 63 percent of voters approved legalizing the medical use of cannabis, supporters for pot law reform outnumbered supporters for President-Elect Barack Obama. <strong></p>
<p>#2 Members Of Congress Demand An End To Federal Pot Possession Arrests </strong></p>
<p>Members of Congress convened a Capitol Hill press conference in July to demand lawmakers enact legislation to eliminate the government&#8217;s authority to arrest and prosecute adults who possess marijuana. Lawmakers called on colleagues to endorse HR 5843, which sought to remove federal penalties for the possession and non-profit transfer of marijuana by adults.   <strong></p>
<p>#3 California Courts Rule: Medical Pot Statutes Don&#8217;t Conflict With Federal Anti-Drug Laws </strong></p>
<p>State provisions allowing for the possession and use of medical marijuana do not conflict with federal anti-drug laws, according to a series of California court rulings. In two separate cases, the California Supreme Court refused to hear challenges to the state&#8217;s 12-year-old marijuana law finding that counties are obligated to issue identification cards to qualified patients and that police cannot seize marijuana from state-sanctioned medical pot users. Read the full story at: <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7678">http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7678</a> .</p>
<p><strong><br />
#4: Marijuana &#8220;Exceptional&#8221; At Reducing MRSA </strong></p>
<p>The administration of natural plant cannabinoids significantly reduces the spread of drug-resistant bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphyloccus aureus (aka MRSA), according to a study published this fall in the Journal of Natural Products. MRSA is responsible for over 18,000 hospital-stay deaths each year.</p>
<p><strong><br />
#5 Marijuana Arrests For 2007 Reach All-Time High </strong></p>
<p>Police arrested a record 872,721 Americans for marijuana violations in 2007, the highest annual total ever reported by the FBI. Since 1965, over 20 million Americans have been arrested for violating state or federal marijuana laws.</p>
<p><strong> #6 Cannabis Determined To Be Less Harmful Than Alcohol </strong></p>
<p>The potential health risks associated with cannabis are less than those associated with alcohol and do not justify the continued criminalization of the plant or its users, according to a report published in October by The Beckley Foundation an independent British think-tank that analyzes drug use and drug policy.</p>
<p><strong> #7 Teen Pot Use Declines In States With Medical Cannabis Laws </strong></p>
<p>States that have enacted legislation authorizing the use of medical cannabis by qualified patients have not experienced an increase in the drug&#8217;s use by the general population, according to a comprehensive report issued in June by the Marijuana Policy Project.</p>
<p><strong> #8 Medical Marijuana Use Not Associated With Adverse Side Effects </strong></p>
<p>The medical use of cannabis is not associated with serious negative side effects, according to a meta-analysis published this summer in the journal of the Canadian Medical Association (CMAJ).</p>
<p><strong> #9 California Attorney General Issues Guidelines Recognizing Patients&#8217; Medical Cannabis Use </strong></p>
<p>State and local law enforcement should not arrest state qualified patients who possess, cultivate, or travel with medical marijuana, according to guidelines issued in August by the California Attorney General&#8217;s office. The guidelines also permit for the distribution and non-profit sales of medical cannabis is permitted by qualified &#8220;collectives and cooperatives.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong> #10 NORML Daily Audio Stash Gains record Listenership </strong></p>
<p>The popularity of NORML&#8217;s podcast grew significantly in 2008, topping more than 110,000 downloads in the month of October alone. Said host Russ Belville, &#8220;When it comes to the subject of marijuana, more and more people are turning away from the federal government and away from the mainstream media; instead, they are turning to groups like NORML and the NORML Daily Audio Stash as their most trusted source of information for all things cannabis.&#8221;</p>
<p>NORML  and the NORML Foundation: 1600 K Street NW, Suite 501, Washington DC, 20006-2832<br />
Tel: (202) 483-5500  Fax: (202) 483-0057  E</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-197" title="usa-small-cannabis" src="http://californiacannabis.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/usa-small-cannabis.gif" alt="usa-small-cannabis" width="125" height="125" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://californiacannabis.net/2009/01/2008-the-year-in-review-normls-top-10-events-that-shaped-marijuana-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NY TIMES: Growing Marijuana With Government Money</title>
		<link>http://californiacannabis.net/2008/12/ny-times-growing-marijuana-with-government-money/</link>
		<comments>http://californiacannabis.net/2008/12/ny-times-growing-marijuana-with-government-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 04:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cali Cannabis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cannabis Growers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research on Cannabis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mahmoud A. Elsohly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national institute on drug abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://californiacannabis.net/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times had question-and-answer interview last Tuesday, December 22, 2008 with Mahmoud A. Elsohly, who grows marijuana for research purposes. He talks about the improved quality of cannabis in Northern California, thanks to growers using modern genetics techniques.</p>
<p>Q. WHAT EXACTLY DOES THE MARIJUANA PROJECT DO?</p>
<p>A. Though cannabis had been used by man for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a title="NY TIMES" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/23/health/23conv.html?bl&amp;ex=1230267600&amp;en=8eb8850aa382ce95&amp;ei=5087%0A">New York Times</a> had question-and-answer interview <a title="NY Times - growing marijuana with govt money" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/23/health/23conv.html?bl&amp;ex=1230267600&amp;en=8eb8850aa382ce95&amp;ei=5087%0A">last Tuesday, December 22, 2008 with Mahmoud A. Elsohly</a>, who grows marijuana for research purposes. He talks about the improved quality of cannabis in Northern California, thanks to growers using modern genetics techniques.</p>
<blockquote><p><span class="bold">Q. WHAT EXACTLY DOES THE MARIJUANA PROJECT DO?</span></p>
<p><span class="bold">A.</span> Though cannabis had been used by man for thousands of years, it wasn’t until 1964 that the actual chemical structure of the active ingredient, tetrahydrocannabinol — THC — was determined. That stimulated new research on the plant.</p>
<p>At this laboratory, which began in 1968, we often investigate marijuana’s chemistry. We also have a farm where we grow cannabis for federally approved researchers. Our material is employed in clinical studies around the country, to see if the active ingredient in this plant is useful for pain, nausea, <a title="In-depth reference and news articles about Glaucoma." href="http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/disease/glaucoma/overview.html?inline=nyt-classifier">glaucoma</a>, for <a title="In-depth reference and news articles about AIDS/H.I.V.." href="http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/disease/aids/overview.html?inline=nyt-classifier">AIDS</a> patients and so on. For these tests, researchers need standardized material for <a title="In-depth reference and news articles about Smoking - tips on how to quit." href="http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/specialtopic/smoking-tips-on-how-to-quit/overview.html?inline=nyt-classifier">cigarettes</a> or THC pills. We grow the cannabis as contractors for the National Institute on Drug Abuse — NIDA. And the only researchers who can get our material are those with special permits. We have visitors at the building now and then who ask, “Oh, do you give samples?” We say, “No!”</p>
<p><span class="bold">Q. WHY BOTHER CULTIVATING YOUR OWN MARIJUANA WHEN LAW ENFORCEMENT ORGANIZATIONS SEIZE BRICKS OF IT EVERY DAY?</span></p>
<p><span class="bold">A.</span> The most obvious reason is that with confiscated marijuana, you don’t really know what you have. When researchers are performing clinical tests, they must have standardized material that will be the same every time. And it must be safe. You certainly wouldn’t want to give a sick person something sprayed with pesticide or <a title="In-depth reference and news articles about Phencyclidine overdose." href="http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/poison/phencyclidine-overdose/overview.html?inline=nyt-classifier">angel dust</a>, substances we’ve detected in some illicit marijuana.</p>
<p>When this project first started in the late 1960s, people thought, “Oh, we’ll get materials for testing after a big bust happens.” So the first batch was acquired that way. They made an extract out of the seized material, and it turned out to be contaminated with tung oil. That brought home the point: if you’re going to do clinical trials on humans, you’d better know what you’re using and where it came from. Hence, our farm.</p>
<p>Another thing: pharmaceutical researchers are often looking at something they call “the dose response.” They want to know what happens to a patient <a title="In-depth reference and news articles about Smoking." href="http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/specialtopic/smoking-and-smokeless-tobacco/overview.html?inline=nyt-classifier">smoking</a> a marijuana cigarette with 1 percent THC versus 2 percent or 8 percent. Without standardized material, you can’t accurately test which produced the best or worst result.</p>
<p><span class="bold">Q. ONE OF THE BASIC PRINCIPLES OF AGRONOMY IS TO START WITH GOOD SEEDS. WHERE DO YOUR SEEDS COME FROM?</span></p>
<p><span class="bold">A.</span> That’s a very good question. Most of the illicit material in the 1960s came from Mexico. So, in collaboration with the D.E.A. and the Mexican government, we acquired those seeds. Later, we acquired others from Colombia, Thailand, Jamaica, India, Pakistan and places in the Middle East. That permitted us to study chemical and botanical differences. By 1976, we were growing about 96 different varieties.</p>
<p>Interestingly, that led us to see that there was only one species of cannabis. It had always been thought that there were many. But you could see that the chemistry of this plant is the same qualitatively no matter where it comes from. What makes each different is the relative proportion of the different chemicals in there, which doesn’t make a different species. It’s really the same species, but different varieties of it. The different types of varieties hybridize very easily.</p>
<p><span class="bold">Q. DOES THIS MEAN THAT ONE COULD MAKE GENETICALLY MODIFIED CANNABIS?</span></p>
<p><span class="bold">A.</span> Yes. Absolutely. That actually has been the trend over the years in the cultivation in the illicit market, and also in the legal market, where we are doing genetic selection, where we select specific materials that have the genes that produce higher levels of THC or some of the other ingredients.</p>
<p><span class="bold">Q. SO OUT THERE IN RURAL NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, HAVE THEY BEEN IMPROVING THEIR CROPS WITH MODERN <a title="In-depth reference and news articles about Genetics." href="http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/specialtopic/genetics/overview.html?inline=nyt-classifier">GENETICS</a>?</span></p>
<p><span class="bold">A.</span> They have been doing genetic selection for years. You can see the potency keeps going up. In the 1970s, the seized marijuana had probably 1 percent or less of the active ingredient. Now, it’s about 8 percent, on the average.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://californiacannabis.net/2008/12/ny-times-growing-marijuana-with-government-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cannabis news across the USA</title>
		<link>http://californiacannabis.net/2008/09/cannabis-news-across-the-usa/</link>
		<comments>http://californiacannabis.net/2008/09/cannabis-news-across-the-usa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cali Cannabis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Americans for Safe Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cannabis Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Cannabis News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fort Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://californiacannabis.net/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Cannabis news in the other 49 states:</p>
<p>* Fort Collins, Colorado &#8211; A Fort Collins couple wants the police to reimburse them $200,000 for their 39 cannabis plants, which were confiscated and died from neglect while in police custody. The LA Times says that , &#8220;a year later, the case against the Masterses &#8212; who claimed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Cannabis news in the other 49 states:</strong></span></p>
<p>* <strong>Fort Collins, Colorado</strong> &#8211; A Fort Collins couple wants the police to reimburse them $200,000 for their 39 cannabis plants, which were confiscated and died from neglect while in police custody. The <a title="LA TImes" href="http://www.latimes.com/features/health/medicine/la-na-pot21-2008sep21,0,4891136.story"><strong>LA Times</strong></a> says that , &#8220;<em>a year later, the case against the Masterses &#8212; who claimed they used the drug for medical purposes &#8212; fell apart, and a judge ordered the police to return their property</em>.&#8221;</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.latimes.com/features/health/medicine/la-na-pot21-2008sep21,0,4891136.story"><strong>LA Times</strong> with a quote from ASA</a>:  &#8220;<em>Of the 12 states that have legalized marijuana for medical use, Colorado stands out for its law specifying that police must not &#8220;harm, neglect or destroy&#8221; seized plants in such cases, said Noah Mamber, legal services coordinator for Americans for Safe Access, an advocacy group.</em></p>
<p>* <strong>Boston</strong> &#8211; <a title="Boston rally" href="http://wbztv.com/massachusettswire/22.0.html?type=local&amp;state=MA&amp;category=n&amp;filename=MA--MarijuanaRally.xml">Six people were arrested</a> at a pro-marijuana rally.</p>
<p>* <strong>Port Orchard, Washington</strong> &#8211; The <a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/6420ap_wa_pot_patient_convicted.html"><strong>Seattle PI reports</strong></a> that a Kitsap County man has been convicted of growing pot, despite having a doctor&#8217;s authorization for medical marijuana under state law.</p>
<p>* <strong>USA (general</strong>)</p>
<blockquote><p><a title="FBI marijuana arrests" href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nation/6012520.html">The <strong>FBI</strong> says</a>:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Marijuana arrests now comprise a shocking 47.5 percent of national drug arrests</strong>, up from 43.9 percent in 2006.</li>
<li><strong> Marijuana arrests</strong> in the United States <strong>rose 5 percent</strong> last year to a record <strong>872,721</strong>.</li>
<li>The 2007 total was more than <strong>43,000</strong> above the previous year&#8217;s 829,627 marijuana arrests.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://californiacannabis.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/marijuana-leaf-733836.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-149" title="marijuana-leaf-733836" src="http://californiacannabis.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/marijuana-leaf-733836-299x300.jpg" alt="" width="299" height="300" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://californiacannabis.net/2008/09/cannabis-news-across-the-usa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
