<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>California Cannabis &#187; Massachusetts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://californiacannabis.net/tag/massachusetts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://californiacannabis.net</link>
	<description>Medical Marijuana News for Patients, in accordance with California State Law Proposition 215 (HS 11362.5)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 07:31:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>National News: The new Massacusetts law that decriminalizes marijuana begins TODAY!</title>
		<link>http://californiacannabis.net/2009/01/national-news-massacusetts-law-decriminalizing-marijuana-begins-today/</link>
		<comments>http://californiacannabis.net/2009/01/national-news-massacusetts-law-decriminalizing-marijuana-begins-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cali Cannabis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Decriminalization of Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Cannabis News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nationwide News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA Marijuana Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://californiacannabis.net/?p=263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A new law that decriminalizes marijuana goes into effect TODAY across the state of Massachusetts.</p>
<p>From The Boston Globe:</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s no longer a crime to have one ounce or less of pot in Massachusetts. The state&#8217;s new marijuana decriminalization law, approved by voters in a November referendum, goes into effect today. Those who are caught with an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A new law that decriminalizes marijuana goes into effect TODAY across the state of Massachusetts.</strong></p>
<p><a title="Boston Globe" href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2009/01/marijuana_decri_1.html">From The Boston Globe:</a></p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;It&#8217;s no longer a crime to have one ounce or less of pot in Massachusetts. The state&#8217;s new marijuana decriminalization law, approved by voters in a November referendum, goes into effect today. Those who are caught with an ounce or less would get a ticket similar to a building code citation. They could appeal the civil infraction in court within 21 days or pay a $100 fine set in the law.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2009/01/02/qa_decriminalizing_marijuana/">Boston.com has a great Q&amp;A interview with Gregory I. Massing, an attorney with the state&#8217;s executive office of public safety &amp; security</a>, regarding the impact of this new law.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Q: Are people allowed to smoke marijuana in public now as long as it is an ounce or less?</strong></p>
<p>A: The new $100 civil penalty for possession of an ounce or less of marijuana applies to smoking marijuana in public: you can&#8217;t smoke it without possessing it. Question 2 gives municipalities the option to pass ordinances or by-laws to make public use of marijuana a crime.</p>
<p><strong>Q: Are people allowed to smoke or use marijuana in private?</strong></p>
<p>A: The same $100 civil penalty applies to smoking or using an ounce or less of marijuana in private. Question 2 did not change the criminal laws prohibiting possession of more than an ounce of marijuana, nor did it change the laws regarding distribution of any amount of marijuana.</p>
<p><strong>Q: Is it legal to buy or sell marijuana?</strong></p>
<p>A: Question 2 did not change the criminal laws prohibiting the distribution, sale, trafficking, or manufacturing of marijuana, or the possession of any amount of marijuana with intent to distribute, sell, traffic, or manufacture. Someone who buys more than an ounce of marijuana can be prosecuted for possessing more than an ounce of marijuana, which is still a crime. Someone who buys an ounce or less of marijuana is subject to the new $100 civil penalty. It is possible that someone who buys any amount of marijuana could be prosecuted for conspiracy to distribute marijuana. The decision whether or not to charge conspiracy is in the discretion of the relevant police department and district attorney&#8217;s office.</p>
<p><strong>Q: Do the same laws apply to minors as adults?</strong></p>
<p>A: Yes, except under Question 2 there are additional provisions (including a requirement to attend a drug awareness program) for persons under 18 who possess an ounce or less of marijuana. See our web site for provisions for offenders under 18.</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;"><img src="http://cache.boston.com/universal/site_graphics/glogo.jpg" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://californiacannabis.net/2009/01/national-news-massacusetts-law-decriminalizing-marijuana-begins-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2008: The Year In Review &#8211; NORML&#8217;s Top 10 Events That Shaped Marijuana Policy</title>
		<link>http://californiacannabis.net/2009/01/2008-the-year-in-review-normls-top-10-events-that-shaped-marijuana-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://californiacannabis.net/2009/01/2008-the-year-in-review-normls-top-10-events-that-shaped-marijuana-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cali Cannabis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Calfornia Medical Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Cannabis Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California NORML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decriminalization of Marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Policy Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Cannabis Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballot measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana law reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical pot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NORML]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staphyloccus aureus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://californiacannabis.net/?p=259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">NORML&#8217;s Top Ten Events That Shaped Marijuana Policy in 2008 </p>
<p> #1 Landslide At The Ballot Box: Election Day Voters Reject Bush War Doctrine </p>
<p>Millions of Americans nationwide voted on Election Day for marijuana law reform, approving nine out of ten ballot measures to liberalize penalties on cannabis use and possession. In Massachusetts, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #008000;"><strong>NORML&#8217;s Top Ten Events That Shaped Marijuana Policy in 2008 </strong></span></p>
<p><strong> #1 Landslide At The Ballot Box: Election Day Voters Reject Bush War Doctrine </strong></p>
<p>Millions of Americans nationwide voted on Election Day for marijuana law reform, approving nine out of ten ballot measures to liberalize penalties on cannabis use and possession. In Massachusetts, where 65 percent of voters decided to reduce marijuana possession penalties to a $100 fine, and Michigan, where 63 percent of voters approved legalizing the medical use of cannabis, supporters for pot law reform outnumbered supporters for President-Elect Barack Obama. <strong></p>
<p>#2 Members Of Congress Demand An End To Federal Pot Possession Arrests </strong></p>
<p>Members of Congress convened a Capitol Hill press conference in July to demand lawmakers enact legislation to eliminate the government&#8217;s authority to arrest and prosecute adults who possess marijuana. Lawmakers called on colleagues to endorse HR 5843, which sought to remove federal penalties for the possession and non-profit transfer of marijuana by adults.   <strong></p>
<p>#3 California Courts Rule: Medical Pot Statutes Don&#8217;t Conflict With Federal Anti-Drug Laws </strong></p>
<p>State provisions allowing for the possession and use of medical marijuana do not conflict with federal anti-drug laws, according to a series of California court rulings. In two separate cases, the California Supreme Court refused to hear challenges to the state&#8217;s 12-year-old marijuana law finding that counties are obligated to issue identification cards to qualified patients and that police cannot seize marijuana from state-sanctioned medical pot users. Read the full story at: <a href="http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7678">http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7678</a> .</p>
<p><strong><br />
#4: Marijuana &#8220;Exceptional&#8221; At Reducing MRSA </strong></p>
<p>The administration of natural plant cannabinoids significantly reduces the spread of drug-resistant bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphyloccus aureus (aka MRSA), according to a study published this fall in the Journal of Natural Products. MRSA is responsible for over 18,000 hospital-stay deaths each year.</p>
<p><strong><br />
#5 Marijuana Arrests For 2007 Reach All-Time High </strong></p>
<p>Police arrested a record 872,721 Americans for marijuana violations in 2007, the highest annual total ever reported by the FBI. Since 1965, over 20 million Americans have been arrested for violating state or federal marijuana laws.</p>
<p><strong> #6 Cannabis Determined To Be Less Harmful Than Alcohol </strong></p>
<p>The potential health risks associated with cannabis are less than those associated with alcohol and do not justify the continued criminalization of the plant or its users, according to a report published in October by The Beckley Foundation an independent British think-tank that analyzes drug use and drug policy.</p>
<p><strong> #7 Teen Pot Use Declines In States With Medical Cannabis Laws </strong></p>
<p>States that have enacted legislation authorizing the use of medical cannabis by qualified patients have not experienced an increase in the drug&#8217;s use by the general population, according to a comprehensive report issued in June by the Marijuana Policy Project.</p>
<p><strong> #8 Medical Marijuana Use Not Associated With Adverse Side Effects </strong></p>
<p>The medical use of cannabis is not associated with serious negative side effects, according to a meta-analysis published this summer in the journal of the Canadian Medical Association (CMAJ).</p>
<p><strong> #9 California Attorney General Issues Guidelines Recognizing Patients&#8217; Medical Cannabis Use </strong></p>
<p>State and local law enforcement should not arrest state qualified patients who possess, cultivate, or travel with medical marijuana, according to guidelines issued in August by the California Attorney General&#8217;s office. The guidelines also permit for the distribution and non-profit sales of medical cannabis is permitted by qualified &#8220;collectives and cooperatives.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong> #10 NORML Daily Audio Stash Gains record Listenership </strong></p>
<p>The popularity of NORML&#8217;s podcast grew significantly in 2008, topping more than 110,000 downloads in the month of October alone. Said host Russ Belville, &#8220;When it comes to the subject of marijuana, more and more people are turning away from the federal government and away from the mainstream media; instead, they are turning to groups like NORML and the NORML Daily Audio Stash as their most trusted source of information for all things cannabis.&#8221;</p>
<p>NORML  and the NORML Foundation: 1600 K Street NW, Suite 501, Washington DC, 20006-2832<br />
Tel: (202) 483-5500  Fax: (202) 483-0057  E</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-197" title="usa-small-cannabis" src="http://californiacannabis.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/usa-small-cannabis.gif" alt="usa-small-cannabis" width="125" height="125" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://californiacannabis.net/2009/01/2008-the-year-in-review-normls-top-10-events-that-shaped-marijuana-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pro-marijuana groups encouraged after USA elections</title>
		<link>http://californiacannabis.net/2008/11/pro-marijuana-groups-encouraged-and-seek-expanded-change/</link>
		<comments>http://californiacannabis.net/2008/11/pro-marijuana-groups-encouraged-and-seek-expanded-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 08:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cali Cannabis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nationwide News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Globe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NORML]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://californiacannabis.net/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I realize this blog is called California Cannabis. However, sometimes we need to throw the spotlight on other states across the country. A movement is building people. In Spring 2009 a key bill being introduced by Barney Frank would decriminalize possession of 3.5 ounces of marijuana or less on a federal level.</p>
<p>More excellent details [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I realize this blog is called California Cannabis. However, sometimes we need to throw the spotlight on other states across the country. A movement is building people. In Spring 2009 a key bill being introduced by Barney Frank would decriminalize possession of 3.5 ounces of marijuana or less on a federal level.</p>
<p>More excellent details from <a title="boston" href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/11/08/marijuana_law_advocates_seek_wider_change/">David Abel of the Boston Globe</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Advocates for the decriminalization of marijuana, savoring their success this week in Massachusetts, said they look forward to a day under an Obama administration and a Democrat-led Congress when it&#8217;s no longer a federal crime to possess small amounts of the drug.</p>
<p>They cited a bill introduced in the spring by Representative Barney Frank, <strong>which would decriminalize possession of marijuana in amounts of 3.5 ounces or less anywhere in the United States</strong>. The bill, if it became law, would end federal prosecution of such crimes, but it would not supersede state laws.</p>
<p>The advocates said they hope the bill would lead to hearings and spark more support from fellow lawmakers in the coming session.</p>
<p>&#8220;We anticipate the bill will be reintroduced fairly early in the next session,&#8221; said Keith Stroup, legal counsel and founder of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), which has long lobbied for the legalization and decriminalization of marijuana. &#8220;Then what we expect is that we will be able to get legislative hearings this session, and maybe a vote on the floor of the House.&#8221;</p>
<p>He said his organization, which helped Frank draft his bill, is looking for a sponsor in the Senate.</p>
<p>But Frank said in a telephone interview that he doesn&#8217;t foresee his bill passing anytime soon. The Newton Democrat said it will take a lot more time before enough of his fellow lawmakers want to take a stand on the issue.</p>
<p>&#8220;What needs to happen is that constituents who support this need to make more calls,&#8221; Frank said. &#8220;This is a case of people being ahead of the politicians.&#8221;</p>
<p>This week, Massachusetts became the <strong>13th state in the country to decriminalize marijuana</strong> when voters approved Question 2 on the ballot, which made getting caught with less than an ounce of marijuana punishable by a civil fine of $100.</p>
<p>The change in the law means someone found carrying multiple joints will no longer be reported to the state&#8217;s criminal history board. The law will require those younger than age 18 to complete a drug awareness program and community service, and for those who don&#8217;t, the fine will increase to as much as $1,000.</p>
<p>The vote in Massachusetts follows a form of decriminalization that passed seven years ago in Nevada, where it remains a felony for anyone under age 21 to possess marijuana. The other states &#8211; Maine, New York, California, North Carolina, Oregon, Ohio, Arizona, Colorado, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska &#8211; decriminalized marijuana in the 1970s, according to NORML.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://californiacannabis.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/medical-marijuana.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-180" title="medical-marijuana" src="http://californiacannabis.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/medical-marijuana.jpg" alt="" width="284" height="156" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://californiacannabis.net/2008/11/pro-marijuana-groups-encouraged-and-seek-expanded-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michigan and Massachusetts voters pass key cannabis reform measures</title>
		<link>http://californiacannabis.net/2008/11/michigan-and-massachusetts-voters-pass-key-cannabis-reform-measures/</link>
		<comments>http://californiacannabis.net/2008/11/michigan-and-massachusetts-voters-pass-key-cannabis-reform-measures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 08:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cali Cannabis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nationwide News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://californiacannabis.net/?p=171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>From the UK Guardian:</p>
<p>Michigan became the 13th state to legalise marijuana for medical use, while Massachusetts decriminalised possession of one ounce or less of the substance, making the offence punishable with a citation and a $100 fine.</p>
<p>&#8220;Tonight&#8217;s results represent a sea change,&#8221; said Rob Kampia, executive director of the Marijuana Policy Project, which backed the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="WSJ" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/nov/05/uselections2008-michigan-marijuana-abortions-southdakota-michigan-massachusetts">From the UK Guardian:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Michigan became the <strong>13th state to legalise marijuana for medical use</strong>, while Massachusetts decriminalised possession of one ounce or less of the substance, making the offence punishable with a citation and a $100 fine.</p>
<p>&#8220;Tonight&#8217;s results represent a sea change,&#8221; said Rob Kampia, executive director of the <strong>Marijuana Policy Project</strong>, which backed the Massachusetts and Michigan ballot proposals. &#8220;Voters have spectacularly rejected eight years of the most intense government war on marijuana since the days of &#8216;Reefer Madness.&#8217;&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://californiacannabis.net/2008/11/michigan-and-massachusetts-voters-pass-key-cannabis-reform-measures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
