List of Sativa
marijuana strains
| Big Fatty |
| Blue Heaven |
| Chanpagne |
| Coral Reef |
| Durban Poison |
| Hawaiian Sativa |
| Kali Mist |
| G-13 |
| Lamb’s Bread |
| Shark Shock |
| Silver Haze |
| Train Wreck |
| White Widow |
list of known sativa marijuana strains.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
List of Sativamarijuana strains
list of known sativa marijuana strains. Indoor Marijuana Strains
List of Indica Marijuana Strains
Sativa / Indicahybrid marijuana strains
A ballot initiative to legalize recreational marijuana use in California has received enough signatures to place it before voters next year, organizers said. The “Tax, Regulate and Control Cannabis Act of 2010” has garnered 680,000 signatures, more than the 433,971 required to be placed on the state’s ballot, said Salwa Ibrahim, a spokeswoman for the measure’s sponsor, Oaksterdam University in Oakland, which bills itself as “America’s first cannabis college.” “We’re going to keep collecting signatures until we have to turn it in,” before the February deadline, Ibrahim said in an interview today. “They’re from all over the state of California.” The measure, which must be certified by the secretary of state before it can officially be placed on the ballot, would allow adults 21 and older to possess an ounce of marijuana and cultivate 25 square feet (2.3 square meters) for personal consumption, Ibrahim said. Cities and counties can decide how and if to tax commercial sales and cultivation. “So for instance, in a Danville or Alamo, if they’re like, ‘Oh my gosh, we do not want dispensaries or any of that in our communities,’ that’s fine, they don’t have to have it,” she said. “But a place like Oakland, where we desperately need the revenue, it would be a perfect fit.” A Field Poll conducted in April showed that 56 percent of registered voters in California supported legalizing and taxing marijuana. From the LA TIMES “Talk Back to Steve Lopez” column:
How about you? I checked in with Gray to get his thoughts on the initiative that appears to have enough votes to make the November ballot. Gray is not a smoker, but he has long preached that it’s time to stop wasting so many resources on investigation, prosecution and incarceration. “The only thing I have a quarrel with,” Gray said of the initiative, is calling it “legalization” of pot. “It’s really regulated control, like alcohol.” Cities and counties could allow the cultivation and sale of marijuana and tax it under the initiative, which would also make it legal for anyone 21 and up to possess an ounce and grow pot for personal use. Backers claim about $1.3 billion in tax revenue could be raised each year. It’s practically legal already, judging by how easy it was for me to get a marijuana “recommendation” from a doctor. Gray said he has been asked to be a spokesman for the initiative, and he’ll be debating L.A. County Dist. Atty. Steve Cooley on various marijuana issues Jan. 19 at the California Club. A poll taken early this year found that 56% of Californians favor legalization, and Gray said he thinks it will pass, but that’s no certainty because “law enforcement and others are going to take their hatchets out.” Let’s put it to a vote right now. Leave yours in the comments below. From the Chicago Daily Herald: With the help of key suburban votes, a plan to let those suffering from certain medical ailments and conditions use marijuana cleared the Illinois Senate Wednesday. The plan was approved 30-28 in the 59-member chamber, garnering the bare minimum of votes needed. “This is not recreational,” said state Sen. Linda Holmes, an Aurora Democrat who has multiple sclerosis. She said the issue is helping people with debilitating conditions improve their quality of life. “It is long overdue,” said Holmes, one of five area Democrats to vote “yes.” The Illinois Senate narrowly approved legislation that would permit the use of marijuana for specific medical ailments. The vote was 30-28 with one member voting present. It now advances to the Illinois House for consideration. Local senators voting yes: Don Harmon, Oak Park Democrat Linda Holmes, Aurora Democrat Dan Kotowski, Park Ridge Democrat Terry Link, Waukegan Democrat Arthur “AJ” Wilhelmi, Joliet Democrat Local senators voting no: Pamela J. Althoff, McHenry Republican Michael Bond, Grayslake Democrat Dan Cronin, Elmhurst Republican Kirk W. Dillard, Hinsdale Republican Dan Duffy, Lake Barrington Republican Susan Garrett, Lake Forest Democrat Randall M. Hultgren, Winfield Republican Chris Lauzen, Aurora Republican John J. Millner, Carol Stream Republican Matt Murphy, Palatine Republican Michael Noland, Elgin Democrat Carole Pankau, Itasca Republican Source: Senate roll call, SB1381
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||